Protecting Your Design Rights

Protecting intellectual property has always been a complex area of law, but in one specific area things may be getting clearer. The Registered Designs Regulations 2001 include several protections for inventors of designs.

If you have a new design which is significantly different (‘novel’) from any previous design that has been made available to the public then you may be able to register the design, provided it has an ‘individual character’. What this means is that the item(s) made from it appear different to an ‘informed user’ of that sort of product.

Having ascertained that the design is sufficiently novel to be registered, the next hurdle is to ensure that the design relates to a product. Under the new regulations this can be almost anything that is an industrial or handicraft item, but it cannot be software. These definitions are less restrictive than the old ones, because they allow protection for the designs of 'one-off' as well as mass-produced products and they allow the registration of the representations of items (icons) as well as industrial designs.

To register a design, you must apply within twelve months of the first public display or use of the design. Under the old rules, the application to register had to be carried out first, before public disclosure of the design.

It is possible to register designs throughout the EC for a period of 25 years by being granted a Registered Community Design.

There are some types of design that cannot be registered. For example, you cannot register an item if it would prevent the use of other parts designed to be attached to it or to match it physically. The main application of this rule will be with regard to spare parts.

Once your design is registered you will have an initial 5 year period during which you have the exclusive right to exploit the design. After that you can have a further twenty-five years provided you renew the rights. For more information, see the UK Intellectual Property Office website.

Under the UK Intellectual Property Act 2014 will make it a criminal offence to deliberately copy a registered UK design or Registered Community Design.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

Court Finds Clarity in Cloudy Cider Trade Mark Dispute
Nature of Confusion Considered in Pet Insurance Trade Mark Dispute
New Code Aims to Boost Music Streaming Licensing Transparency
Registering a Trade Mark is the Best Way to Protect Your Valuable Brand
Local Authority Pays the Price for Privacy and Data Protection Breaches
High Court Aids Professional Firm Targeted in Ransomware Cyberattack
Selling a Business? Warts and All Disclosure is Vital
Direct Marketing Company Pays Price for Relaxed Approach to Personal Data
Creators of John Lewis Dragon Advert Cleared of 'Copying' Allegation
Seen One Television Drama? You've Seen Them All - Copyright Ruling
New UK Version of GDPR Progressing Through Parliament
Fast Fashion Retailer's Founder Sees Off 'You Stole My Idea' Allegation
Design Rights - Supermarkets Battle Over 'Strikingly' Similar Gin Bottles
Passing Off - Injunction Refused in Battle Between Premium Vodka Brands
High Court Aids Company Facing $6.8 Million Ransomware Demand
The Sticky Story of Paddington Bear and the Royalty Distribution Litigation
Rock Band's Valuable Name Forms Focus of Bitter Passing Off Dispute
Registering a Trade Mark? Are You Sure No One Else Got There First?
Red Bull Wings to Victory in High Court Trade Mark Dispute
How to Limit the Damage of Commercial Data Leaks? Consult a Solicitor
Are You the Target of a Libellous Online Review? Consult a Lawyer Today
Design Rights - Inspiration is One Thing But Deliberate Copying Quite Another
Trade Union Targeted by Social Media Campaign Awarded £50,000 Damages
Christening a New Business? It's Madness Not to Seek Professional Advice
Design Rights - Tourist Hoodies and T-Shirts Lack Novelty, High Court Rules
High Court Aids Ship Designer in 'Blatant' Breach of Confidentiality Case
Internet Piracy - Gaming Giant Nintendo Granted Websites Blocking Order
Employers are Generally Entitled to Fruits of Their Employees' Creativity
Ticket Touts Cannot Justify the Unjustifiable - Landmark Court of Appeal Ruling
Is Data Centre 'White Space' Subject to Business Rates? Question Answered
Film Studios Faced by Piracy Scourge Granted Internet Blocking Orders
AI Machines May Take Over, But Not Yet - Landmark Patents Ruling
Indirect Consumer Confusion - Bourbon Supplier Wins Trade Mark Battle
Even Modest Sole Traders Can Reap the Benefits of Trade Mark Protection
Naming a New Business? Watch Out for Others' Intellectual Property Rights
Is It Acceptable to Poke Fun at a Competitor? High Court Tackles the Issue
Website Terms and Conditions Ruled Worthless in Online Gambling Test Case
UK Internet Entrepreneur Wins £75,000 Libel Damages from Overseas Website
High Court Aids Record Industry to Stamp Out Stream Ripping
High Court Contract Dispute Focuses on Online Gambling Domain Name
Inner Workings of Online Property Platforms Analysed in Shares Sale Row
Writer's Ex-Partner Wins Recognition as Co-Author of Hollywood Screenplay
Maker of 'Shapewear' Jeans Blocks 'Rip-Off' Product from the Market
Live Boxing Events Organiser Granted 'Dynamic' Internet Blocking Order
Rightmove Fails in 'Confusingly Similar' Website Complaint
Advent of Artificial Intelligence Poses Fundamental Questions in Patents Case
Mormon Church Wrests Control of 'Confusing' Domain Name
'Average Consumer' Takes Centre Stage in Beverages Trade Mark Dispute
British Gymnastics Scores 10 Out of 10 in Trade Mark Infringement Dispute
Revolutionary Garden Hose Design Too 'Obvious' for Patent Protection
Prosecco Producers Successfully Oppose 'Nosecco' Trade Mark Registration