Landlords - Dealing With Pre-Pack Tenants

Businesses in financial difficulties are increasingly seeking ways of ridding themselves of extra costs and, in many cases, premises let in more promising economic times are viewed as a substantial and avoidable liability, especially for businesses which have expanded too quickly.

One of the more common ways for a business to be restructured on a more profitable basis is to arrange to take the profitable parts into a new business by doing a ‘pre-pack’ administration – a procedure whereby the business, or part of it, is transferred to a new entity. Prior to this, the business will be placed into administration, which imposes a moratorium on legal processes, such as the landlord’s right to make the lease forfeit by peaceable re-entry.

The argument for pre-packs is that they maximise the chance of salvaging the business and preserving employment. On the downside, the creditors of the original business are often left nursing losses.

From the landlord’s perspective, a tenant which undertakes a pre-pack may well leave the rented unit behind if it is uneconomic to retain it, thus leaving the landlord facing the prospect of finding a new tenant and a loss of rental income.

If the new business wishes to retain the unit, there may be scope for the landlord to negotiate with the new occupier with regard to arrears of rent as well as adherence to the lease covenants.

The good news for landlords is that in most cases they should be entitled to retain a rent deposit paid by a tenant that goes into administration.

A recent case has also confirmed that it will be difficult in many circumstances for administrators to assign a tenancy 'by operaton of law'  - the landlord will normally have to made it unequivocal by its conduct that the prior tenant's tenancy had ended and a new tenancy begun.

A 2018 case confirmed that where a landlord wishes to use the statutory Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR procedure that was introduced in 2014, the right will be lost to accept the tenancy as ceasing.

 

 

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

Marks & Spencer Claims Planning Victory at High Court
Court Ruling Underlines the Importance of Biodiversity in Planning Decisions
Under-Insured Commercial Property Occupier Wins Seven-Figure Damages
Business Use of Residential Property - Upper Tribunal Strikes the Balance
Football Club's Crowd Control Challenge to Development Kicked Into Touch
Applications for Fresh Commercial Tenancies - Court of Appeal Guidance
Quarry Owner Hit Hard in the Pocket for Causing Noise and Dust Nuisance
Retail Tenant Forced to Relocate Receives Compensation for Permanent Loss of Profit
Landlord of Converted Office Block Pays Price for Breaching Fire Safety Rules
Education Charity Overcomes Restrictive Covenant in College's Title Deeds
Outdoor Advertising, Light Pollution and a Legal Battle Over a Bus Shelter
Commercial Landlords Hit Hard in Gym Clubs' COVID-19 Restructuring
Renewal of Commercial Leases - It Can All Come Down to Judicial Discretion
Landmark Golf Course's Status as Asset of Community Value Upheld
Hard-Up Landlord's Rent Repayment Order Slashed
Property Information Forms - Inaccurate Answers Cost Developer
Assessing Development Potential is Not Just Crystal Ball Gazing
Business Interruption Insurance Disputes - Is Arbitration Obligatory?
Compulsory Purchase - What Happens if a Landowner's Identity is Unknown?
Plan to Redevelop Debenhams Department Store Receives High Court Boost
Waste Transfer Station Occupier Succeeds in Slashing Business Rates Bills
Commercial Property Owner Charged for Non-Existent Drainage Services
Council Planning Committee Fends Off 'Closed Minds' Allegation
Supreme Court Lays Down the Law on Commercial Property Service Charges
Community Football Pitch Must Make Way for Strategic Stadium Development
5G Mobile Phone Masts Can't Be Located Just Anywhere - High Court Ruling
Heritage Assets - High Court Quashes Apartment Block Planning Permission
Trespass - Judge Identifies Perpetrators of Vast Waste Dumping Operation
Property Guardianship Agreement Proves Fraught with Legal Difficulty
Cinema Operators Not Entitled to Rent Relief During COVID-19 Lockdowns
Tenant Succeeds in Modifying Use Restriction in Commercial Lease
Former Tenant of Historic Hotel Ordered to Pay Six-Figure Dilapidation Costs
Determined Developer Overcomes Agricultural Use Restriction
High Street Al Fresco Boost Via Licensing Regime Extension
Upper Tribunal Business Rates Ruling Marks High Street's Sad Decline
Flooding Nuisance - Frustrated Developer Wins Right to Compensation
Times Change and Antique Restrictive Covenants Become Obsolete
Agricultural Tenancy Dispute Raises Tricky Company Law Conundrum
Stamp Duty, Multiple Dwellings Relief and Apportionment
Upward Extension of Residential Blocks - Guideline High Court Ruling
Motor Racing Circuit Development Passes High Court Noise Test
'Hope Value' Boosts Compulsory Purchase Compensation Award
What is a 'Controversial' Planning Application? High Court Gives Guidance
Forced to Shut Your Commercial Premises During Lockdowns? Read This
Rugby Club's Expansion Plans Not Inhibited by 1922 Restrictive Covenant
Empty Cinema Blaze Triggers Landmark Court of Appeal Ruling
Companies and the Concealment of Land Ownership - High Court Ruling
Affordable Housing Shortage Proves Decisive in High Court Planning Case
The Legal Status of Property Guardians - Court of Appeal Clarifies the Law
Housing Project Survives Historic Airfield Owner's High Court Challenge
Renewal of Commercial Leases - Intention is More than Mere Contemplation