Options and Pre-emption Rights

Prospective purchasers and vendors of land frequently wish to ‘lock in’ the other party to the deal and the means by which this is done will normally involve the prospective vendor either giving the prospective purchaser an option to purchase the land or granting the right of pre-emption over its acquisition.

The two sorts of arrangement might seem at first glance to be the same, but there are significant differences between them.

Under an option to purchase agreement, the prospective purchaser is given the right to buy the land, possibly subject to the occurrence of a certain event or events, for a limited period of time. If the specified event occurs, the right to purchase is absolute.

A pre-emption agreement, however, gives the prospective purchaser the right to be ‘first in the queue’ should the landowner decide to sell the land within the pre-emption period.

Accordingly, an immediate right over the land is created under an option. An option will also bind a future owner of the land in question. A pre-emption agreement, however, does not create an immediate interest in the land. If the owner of the land decides not to fulfil the conditions which ‘trigger’ the pre-emption agreement, the holder of the pre-emption rights will never see them come into effect. However, pre-emption rights in regard to registered land take effect at the time of their creation and can therefore be binding on subsequent owners.

There are two other important differences between options and pre-emption agreements. To be binding, an option must be made in writing. This is because an option is a conditional contract for the sale of land and, under English law, contracts for the sale of land must be in writing. A pre-emption agreement need not be made in writing, although it is sensible to do so. In the case of a pre-emption agreement, the contract for land only comes into effect when the trigger event occurs and the holder of the pre-emption right then makes the offer for purchase, which the landowner is bound to accept. At that stage the contract must be put in writing.

The use of options and pre-emption agreements also create somewhat different tax positions and any negotiation of an option or pre-emption agreement should be carried out with the benefit of professional advice.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

Marks & Spencer Claims Planning Victory at High Court
Court Ruling Underlines the Importance of Biodiversity in Planning Decisions
Under-Insured Commercial Property Occupier Wins Seven-Figure Damages
Business Use of Residential Property - Upper Tribunal Strikes the Balance
Football Club's Crowd Control Challenge to Development Kicked Into Touch
Applications for Fresh Commercial Tenancies - Court of Appeal Guidance
Quarry Owner Hit Hard in the Pocket for Causing Noise and Dust Nuisance
Retail Tenant Forced to Relocate Receives Compensation for Permanent Loss of Profit
Landlord of Converted Office Block Pays Price for Breaching Fire Safety Rules
Education Charity Overcomes Restrictive Covenant in College's Title Deeds
Outdoor Advertising, Light Pollution and a Legal Battle Over a Bus Shelter
Commercial Landlords Hit Hard in Gym Clubs' COVID-19 Restructuring
Renewal of Commercial Leases - It Can All Come Down to Judicial Discretion
Landmark Golf Course's Status as Asset of Community Value Upheld
Hard-Up Landlord's Rent Repayment Order Slashed
Property Information Forms - Inaccurate Answers Cost Developer
Assessing Development Potential is Not Just Crystal Ball Gazing
Business Interruption Insurance Disputes - Is Arbitration Obligatory?
Compulsory Purchase - What Happens if a Landowner's Identity is Unknown?
Plan to Redevelop Debenhams Department Store Receives High Court Boost
Waste Transfer Station Occupier Succeeds in Slashing Business Rates Bills
Commercial Property Owner Charged for Non-Existent Drainage Services
Council Planning Committee Fends Off 'Closed Minds' Allegation
Supreme Court Lays Down the Law on Commercial Property Service Charges
Community Football Pitch Must Make Way for Strategic Stadium Development
5G Mobile Phone Masts Can't Be Located Just Anywhere - High Court Ruling
Heritage Assets - High Court Quashes Apartment Block Planning Permission
Trespass - Judge Identifies Perpetrators of Vast Waste Dumping Operation
Property Guardianship Agreement Proves Fraught with Legal Difficulty
Cinema Operators Not Entitled to Rent Relief During COVID-19 Lockdowns
Tenant Succeeds in Modifying Use Restriction in Commercial Lease
Former Tenant of Historic Hotel Ordered to Pay Six-Figure Dilapidation Costs
Determined Developer Overcomes Agricultural Use Restriction
High Street Al Fresco Boost Via Licensing Regime Extension
Upper Tribunal Business Rates Ruling Marks High Street's Sad Decline
Flooding Nuisance - Frustrated Developer Wins Right to Compensation
Times Change and Antique Restrictive Covenants Become Obsolete
Agricultural Tenancy Dispute Raises Tricky Company Law Conundrum
Stamp Duty, Multiple Dwellings Relief and Apportionment
Upward Extension of Residential Blocks - Guideline High Court Ruling
Motor Racing Circuit Development Passes High Court Noise Test
'Hope Value' Boosts Compulsory Purchase Compensation Award
What is a 'Controversial' Planning Application? High Court Gives Guidance
Forced to Shut Your Commercial Premises During Lockdowns? Read This
Rugby Club's Expansion Plans Not Inhibited by 1922 Restrictive Covenant
Empty Cinema Blaze Triggers Landmark Court of Appeal Ruling
Companies and the Concealment of Land Ownership - High Court Ruling
Affordable Housing Shortage Proves Decisive in High Court Planning Case
The Legal Status of Property Guardians - Court of Appeal Clarifies the Law
Housing Project Survives Historic Airfield Owner's High Court Challenge
Renewal of Commercial Leases - Intention is More than Mere Contemplation