Focus On... ACAS Early Conciliation

1. FOCUS ON… ACAS EARLY CONCILIATION

ACAS Early Conciliation became compulsory on 6 May 2014. Employees or former employees must now contact ACAS prior to issuing most claims at an Employment Tribunal.

Due to the introduction of fees (which individuals have to pay before issuing a claim at Tribunal). Tribunals have seen a significant drop in the number of claims being issued. The introduction of ACAS Early Conciliation may see more individuals making initial contact with ACAS to try and negotiate with their employer (or former employer) even though they may not subsequently issue proceedings.

 

The Early Conciliation Process

The process of Early Conciliation is as follows:

  1. The employee submits a short compulsory form online or over the telephone.

 

  1. When this is received by ACAS, a process called “stop the clock” takes effect. This means that the time limit for bringing claims to the Tribunal (usually three months) is paused to allow Early Conciliation or settlement discussions to take place. This pause is for up to a month (although an extension of two weeks is possible if the parties are in active talks).

 

  1. An employer can also make a request for early conciliation, however if this occurs, the “stop the clock” process does not apply.

 

  1. Following the submission of the form, ACAS will then contact the individual to obtain further details. This will either be the same day or the following day.

 

  1. If the individual wishes to explore Early Conciliation, ACAS will then attempt to contact the employer or former employer using the details provided by the individual.

 

  1. If the employer wants to engage in discussions, Early Conciliation will take place.

 

  1. If an agreement is reached, ACAS will record any agreement on a COT3 which prevents the individual issuing a claim at Tribunal (similar to a Settlement Agreement, formerly Compromise Agreements).

 

  1. If agreement is not reached (and it is not mandatory for either party to engage in Early Conciliation), ACAS will issue a certificate which allows the employee to bring a Tribunal claim. Under the “stop the clock” process, the individual will have a minimum of one month following the end of Early Conciliation to submit a claim to the Tribunal.

 

Practical Tips for Organisations

  • Be prepared for the initial contact from ACAS - ACAS will use the details provided by the individual to contact you. As such, it may be the case that ACAS will contact a line manager/supervisor rather than the decision maker. It is therefore important for you to ensure that all management are aware of ACAS’ role and who calls should be directed to. ACAS have set up a national contacts list to enable organisations to nominate a contact, please contact us for further details in relation to this.

 

  • Collect any relevant evidence – Where you are aware there is likely to be a claim or contact from ACAS, make sure you can access any relevant documents and information quickly to provide an informed and strategic response to ACAS.

 

  • Make sure all calls are returned - All calls from ACAS should be taken or messages returned. Failure to do so may result in a Tribunal claim being submitted by an individual rather than a settlement being entered into. This is likely to be more costly and time consuming for you as you would need to draft a defence and any settlement entered into after the issuing of proceedings is also likely to include the fee the individual had to pay to issue the claim.

 

  • ACAS are not independent legal advisors - ACAS will not be able to advise you whether an offer made by an individual is a reasonable offer in the circumstances. Therefore it is advisable that you seek advice from us to prevent you from paying over and above the amount the individual would be entitled to if they were successful at Tribunal.

 

  • Contents of the COT3 agreements - You should ensure that the COT3 agreement covers all claims which could be brought by the individual. Failure to include all claims could result in further claims being brought by the individual.  It is therefore important that you liaise with us at this stage – if not earlier!

 

  • Will the individual issue proceedings? Tactically, you could consider whether to wait and see if the individual issues proceedings before negotiating a settlement. Where you want to explore settlement the Early Conciliation process may present a good opportunity to settle quickly and where possibly cheaply! However, since the introduction of fees, the number of claims have significantly reduced and therefore you may want to wait to see if they issue proceedings. That said, as set out above, you may find it more difficult and expensive to settle after proceedings have been issued.

 

  • You will not always hear from ACAS even when an individual submits a claim – ACAS will only become involved if the individual AND the organisation want to enter into conciliation discussions. If the individual is not interested in conciliation, ACAS will not contact you and they will be allowed to proceed with issuing a claim at Tribunal.

 

  • Take the initiative – In some circumstances, you may want to begin the ACAS Early conciliation process. If so, you do not have to wait for ACAS to contact you. If you make the initial contact with ACAS, the time limit for the individual to issue a claim at the Tribunal is not paused. Therefore, in some circumstances, this may be a useful tactic which could put pressure on an individual to settle quickly.

 

For more information in relation to Early Conciliation, please contact a member of the team.

 

Latest News

New Recommendations Published to Help Workplaces Support Autistic Employees
Will Employment Tribunal Fees Be Reintroduced?
HSE Bidding to Reduce Asbestos Exposure in the Workplace
Work From Home Dispute Raises Key Issue for the Modern Workplace
Bank Relieved of Compensation Bill Despite Employee's Unfair Dismissal
A Fair Redundancy Process Requires Consultation at a Formative Stage
Latest HSE Statistics Highlight Prevalence of Work-Related Stress
Are Bonus Clawback Provisions an Unreasonable Restraint of Trade?
Resignation in the Heat of the Moment - EAT Sets Out the Legal Principles
Gender Transition - Deadnamed Employee Wins Substantial Compensation
Treating Every Employee in the Same Way May Itself Be Discriminatory
Not Every Procedural Defect Will Render a Dismissal Unfair - Guideline Ruling
Disability Discrimination - Corner Shops Owe the Same Duties as Multinationals
Employment Status, Control and Mutuality of Obligation - Guideline Ruling
School Inspector Sacked for Touching Pupil Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
Retail Worker Sacked for Smoking at Work Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
Did European Works Councils Survive Brexit? 'Yes' Rules the Court of Appeal
Phone Call to Disabled Postman on Sick Leave Ruled an 'Act of Harassment'
Want to Stop a Key Employee Joining a Competitor? Consult a Solicitor Today
Coarse Language in the Workplace - ET Upholds Harassment Claim
Disability Discrimination and Hypothetical Comparators
Redundant Automotive Industry Worker Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
National Minimum Wage Rates in Force for 2023
Whistleblowing and the Importance of Proving Motive
Veteran Care Worker Succeeds in Constructive Unfair Dismissal Claim
Manager's 'Limitations' Comment Leads to Disability Discrimination Finding
Writing a Job Reference? It's Important to Choose Your Words Carefully
College Student Required to Work Late Succeeds in Age Discrimination Claim
Cooling Off Periods and Retraction of Oral Resignations - Guideline Ruling
Informed of an Employee Pregnancy? Choose Your Words Carefully
Are Adjustments that Disadvantage Non-Disabled Employees Reasonable?
Length of Service Redundancy Criteria Ageist, ET Rules
High Street Retailer's Insolvency Triggers Guideline TUPE Ruling
How to Conduct a Fair Redundancy Exercise - Guideline EAT Ruling
Employee Bonuses - A Commitment is a Commitment
Logistics Operative Succeeds in Post-Termination Victimisation Complaint
Non-Executive Directors and 'Worker' Status - Guideline Ruling
Sandwich Shop Worker Wins Workplace Harassment Claim
Offering Internships? You May Have to Pay the National Minimum Wage
COVID-19, Furlough and a Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments
Tweeting Lay Tribunal Member Recused From Hearing Controversial Appeal
Can a Sham Procedure Comply With the Acas Code?
Survey Shows Post-Pandemic Leap in Hybrid Working
'Long Covid' Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling
Coach Driver Who 'Called it a Day' Did Not Resign, ET Rules
Employment - Improper Behaviour in Pre-Termination Negotiations
Clandestine Rendezvous Leads to Unfair Constructive Dismissal Finding
Harassment - The English Language Evolves and So Must the Workplace
COVID-19 Pandemic Has Brought Employment Status Disputes to a Head
What is a Detriment? EAT Ruling Clearly Sets Out the Correct Legal Test
Tech Company Failed to Make Reasonable Adjustments for Cancer Sufferer