PRA Firms and Bonus Clawback Provisions

By way of explanation, A PRA approved firm is one that is regulated by The Prudential Regulation Authority (“the PRA”).  The PRA is part of the Bank of England and essentially regulates, supervises and sets standards for financial institutions eg. Banks, building societies, insurers.

I was shocked to learn that since the economic crisis erupted in 2008 approximately £80 billion has been paid out in bonus payments to bankers. 

When reading of such bonus payments having been made, being the cynical employment lawyer that I am, I often wonder what would happen if having received the bonus payment it becomes apparent that the banker has acted in a corrupt/immoral way or has just simply not behaved as a “model” employee should:  Can the bank then recouperate the bonus or not?

Following considerable political/media pressure, I (for one) was therefore pleased to learn that from 1st January 2015 PRA approved firms will be able to claw back variable remuneration (ie. Bonus payments) that have been paid to its employees where it deems it appropriate to do so.  For all variable remuneration payments made on or after 1st January 2015, there is now the ability for the PRA firm to claw back such payments for a period of up to 7 years from the time that it is paid to the employee.

However when exercising the ability to claw back payments made, the firm must act proportionately assessed on an individual case by case basis.  For example, bonus payments may be clawed back in circumstances where an employee has acted in such a way that he is regarded to have misbehaved, where there is employee error or where the firm suffers a material risk of failure or loss. 

Such firms do however need to make it clear to their employees in what circumstances the remuneration can be clawed back and in that respect, their documentation should be amended to reflect this.

Latest News

Legal Obligations and Menopause - New Employer Guidance
New Recommendations Published to Help Workplaces Support Autistic Employees
Will Employment Tribunal Fees Be Reintroduced?
HSE Bidding to Reduce Asbestos Exposure in the Workplace
Work From Home Dispute Raises Key Issue for the Modern Workplace
Bank Relieved of Compensation Bill Despite Employee's Unfair Dismissal
A Fair Redundancy Process Requires Consultation at a Formative Stage
Latest HSE Statistics Highlight Prevalence of Work-Related Stress
Are Bonus Clawback Provisions an Unreasonable Restraint of Trade?
Resignation in the Heat of the Moment - EAT Sets Out the Legal Principles
Gender Transition - Deadnamed Employee Wins Substantial Compensation
Treating Every Employee in the Same Way May Itself Be Discriminatory
Not Every Procedural Defect Will Render a Dismissal Unfair - Guideline Ruling
Disability Discrimination - Corner Shops Owe the Same Duties as Multinationals
Employment Status, Control and Mutuality of Obligation - Guideline Ruling
School Inspector Sacked for Touching Pupil Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
Retail Worker Sacked for Smoking at Work Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
Did European Works Councils Survive Brexit? 'Yes' Rules the Court of Appeal
Phone Call to Disabled Postman on Sick Leave Ruled an 'Act of Harassment'
Want to Stop a Key Employee Joining a Competitor? Consult a Solicitor Today
Coarse Language in the Workplace - ET Upholds Harassment Claim
Disability Discrimination and Hypothetical Comparators
Redundant Automotive Industry Worker Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
National Minimum Wage Rates in Force for 2023
Whistleblowing and the Importance of Proving Motive
Veteran Care Worker Succeeds in Constructive Unfair Dismissal Claim
Manager's 'Limitations' Comment Leads to Disability Discrimination Finding
Writing a Job Reference? It's Important to Choose Your Words Carefully
College Student Required to Work Late Succeeds in Age Discrimination Claim
Cooling Off Periods and Retraction of Oral Resignations - Guideline Ruling
Informed of an Employee Pregnancy? Choose Your Words Carefully
Are Adjustments that Disadvantage Non-Disabled Employees Reasonable?
Length of Service Redundancy Criteria Ageist, ET Rules
High Street Retailer's Insolvency Triggers Guideline TUPE Ruling
How to Conduct a Fair Redundancy Exercise - Guideline EAT Ruling
Employee Bonuses - A Commitment is a Commitment
Logistics Operative Succeeds in Post-Termination Victimisation Complaint
Non-Executive Directors and 'Worker' Status - Guideline Ruling
Sandwich Shop Worker Wins Workplace Harassment Claim
Offering Internships? You May Have to Pay the National Minimum Wage
COVID-19, Furlough and a Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments
Tweeting Lay Tribunal Member Recused From Hearing Controversial Appeal
Can a Sham Procedure Comply With the Acas Code?
Survey Shows Post-Pandemic Leap in Hybrid Working
'Long Covid' Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling
Coach Driver Who 'Called it a Day' Did Not Resign, ET Rules
Employment - Improper Behaviour in Pre-Termination Negotiations
Clandestine Rendezvous Leads to Unfair Constructive Dismissal Finding
Harassment - The English Language Evolves and So Must the Workplace
COVID-19 Pandemic Has Brought Employment Status Disputes to a Head
What is a Detriment? EAT Ruling Clearly Sets Out the Correct Legal Test