Written Statement of Employment Particulars

A contract of employment may be verbal but all employees, whether part-time or full-time, are entitled by law to be given a written statement setting out the main particulars of their employment, provided their employment lasts for one month or more. Currently, all the required particulars must be given within two months of the start of the employment, unless the employee is to work abroad for more than one month within two months of commencing employment. In this case, the information must be provided before the employee goes away.

It is not necessary to provide all the required information at the same time. It can be given in separate documents provided certain details are collected together in one principal statement. These are:

  • the names of the employer and the employee;
  • the job title or a description of the job;
  • the date on which the employment began;
  • if a previous job counts towards a period of continuous employment, the date on which the period started;
  • the hours of work, including whether employees will have to work Sundays, nights or overtime;
  • the remuneration and whether pay is weekly, monthly etc.;
  • holiday entitlement; and
  • the address(es) of the place or places of work and whether the employee might have to relocate.

As well as the principal statement, the following information must also be provided in writing:

  • where the job is not permanent, the period for which the employment is expected to continue or, if it is for a fixed term, the date on which it is to end;
  • the length of notice the employee must give or is entitled to receive;
  • details of any relevant collective agreements;
  • details of pensions and pension schemes;
  • who to go to with a grievance;
  • how to complain about how a grievance is handled; and
  • how to complain about a disciplinary or dismissal decision.

The written statement need not include the following but, where it does not, it must say where the information can be found:

  • sick pay and procedures;
  • disciplinary and dismissal procedures; and
  • grievance procedures.

If an employee is required to work outside the UK for a period of more than one month, then the statement of employment particulars must also specify:

  • the period for which the employee is to work outside the UK;
  • the currency in which remuneration is to be paid while the employee is working abroad;
  • any additional pay and benefits; and
  • any terms and conditions relating to the employee’s return to the UK.

If an employee is sent to work in another country in the European Economic Area, the terms and conditions of his or her employment must meet the legal minimum requirements in that country as regards:

  • working hours and rest breaks;
  • holiday entitlement; and
  • minimum pay (including overtime).

Employers do have a degree of flexibility as to how to communicate the statement of employment particulars. If a written contract or letter of engagement provides the required information and is given to the employee within the appropriate time limits, then a separate statement of particulars is not required.

Under Section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, unless there are exceptional circumstances that would make an award inequitable, an employee whose employer fails to provide them with a written statement of employment particulars within the set time frame could be entitled to a minimum award of two weeks' pay or a maximum award of four weeks' pay, depending on the circumstances. This right only applies, however, if the employee has successfully brought another substantive claim.

Dismissing an employee for exercising or trying to exercise his or her statutory right to a written statement of employment particulars is automatically unfair dismissal with no minimum service requirement.

As proposed in the Government's 'Good Work Plan' on employment rights, published in December 2018 in response to the 2017 Taylor Review of Modern Working Practices, legislation has now been passed (The Employment Rights (Employment Particulars and Paid Annual Leave) (Amendment) Regulations 2018) that makes changes to the Employment Rights Act 1996 so that the right to be given a written statement of employment particulars is a day one right that is extended to all staff – workers as well as employees. The changes are due to take effect from April 2020.

An example of a written statement of employment particulars form which meets the requirements of employment legislation is available from the GOV.UK website. Guidance on completing the form can be found at the end of the document.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.

Latest News

New Recommendations Published to Help Workplaces Support Autistic Employees
Will Employment Tribunal Fees Be Reintroduced?
HSE Bidding to Reduce Asbestos Exposure in the Workplace
Work From Home Dispute Raises Key Issue for the Modern Workplace
Bank Relieved of Compensation Bill Despite Employee's Unfair Dismissal
A Fair Redundancy Process Requires Consultation at a Formative Stage
Latest HSE Statistics Highlight Prevalence of Work-Related Stress
Are Bonus Clawback Provisions an Unreasonable Restraint of Trade?
Resignation in the Heat of the Moment - EAT Sets Out the Legal Principles
Gender Transition - Deadnamed Employee Wins Substantial Compensation
Treating Every Employee in the Same Way May Itself Be Discriminatory
Not Every Procedural Defect Will Render a Dismissal Unfair - Guideline Ruling
Disability Discrimination - Corner Shops Owe the Same Duties as Multinationals
Employment Status, Control and Mutuality of Obligation - Guideline Ruling
School Inspector Sacked for Touching Pupil Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
Retail Worker Sacked for Smoking at Work Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
Did European Works Councils Survive Brexit? 'Yes' Rules the Court of Appeal
Phone Call to Disabled Postman on Sick Leave Ruled an 'Act of Harassment'
Want to Stop a Key Employee Joining a Competitor? Consult a Solicitor Today
Coarse Language in the Workplace - ET Upholds Harassment Claim
Disability Discrimination and Hypothetical Comparators
Redundant Automotive Industry Worker Succeeds in Unfair Dismissal Claim
National Minimum Wage Rates in Force for 2023
Whistleblowing and the Importance of Proving Motive
Veteran Care Worker Succeeds in Constructive Unfair Dismissal Claim
Manager's 'Limitations' Comment Leads to Disability Discrimination Finding
Writing a Job Reference? It's Important to Choose Your Words Carefully
College Student Required to Work Late Succeeds in Age Discrimination Claim
Cooling Off Periods and Retraction of Oral Resignations - Guideline Ruling
Informed of an Employee Pregnancy? Choose Your Words Carefully
Are Adjustments that Disadvantage Non-Disabled Employees Reasonable?
Length of Service Redundancy Criteria Ageist, ET Rules
High Street Retailer's Insolvency Triggers Guideline TUPE Ruling
How to Conduct a Fair Redundancy Exercise - Guideline EAT Ruling
Employee Bonuses - A Commitment is a Commitment
Logistics Operative Succeeds in Post-Termination Victimisation Complaint
Non-Executive Directors and 'Worker' Status - Guideline Ruling
Sandwich Shop Worker Wins Workplace Harassment Claim
Offering Internships? You May Have to Pay the National Minimum Wage
COVID-19, Furlough and a Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments
Tweeting Lay Tribunal Member Recused From Hearing Controversial Appeal
Can a Sham Procedure Comply With the Acas Code?
Survey Shows Post-Pandemic Leap in Hybrid Working
'Long Covid' Recognised as a Disability in Important Employment Ruling
Coach Driver Who 'Called it a Day' Did Not Resign, ET Rules
Employment - Improper Behaviour in Pre-Termination Negotiations
Clandestine Rendezvous Leads to Unfair Constructive Dismissal Finding
Harassment - The English Language Evolves and So Must the Workplace
COVID-19 Pandemic Has Brought Employment Status Disputes to a Head
What is a Detriment? EAT Ruling Clearly Sets Out the Correct Legal Test
Tech Company Failed to Make Reasonable Adjustments for Cancer Sufferer